LOL! This is FOR SURE your homework!!!! Good luck kid.

3 rd keeping jobs here would be best for the economy and america

None of the above.US doesn't have enough trade with Britain, France, Argentina or Chile to make an appreciable difference in the economy.An embargo against Chinese goods (even more than just toys) would have little or no effect because the Chinese are already moving factories to other third world countries to avoid the lingering issues with lead in paint and melamine in food.

The First Bill sounds like a good deal,(very suitable) but All three leaves someone suffering but for the better of the economy i would say the second congressional bill.

NAFTA has helped the Economy much more damage. The U.S. auto industry to look at to see. I think it would do better on Chinese toys, the embargo. Toys, why stop? Many of the Chinese products just fine but very often receives the junk and potentially harmful.

__________________
flower seeds|plants by post

I'm not abiding if the added two will accept abundant of an effect. NAFTA has had appealing abundant an economically aloof aftereffect afterwards it was passed: appropriately ample numbers of jobs were both acquired and lost.If you ask me, get Bush out of office, and bandy out the two capital candidates, too.

__________________
mp3 players for running